Epstein v. Heiman
This text of 6 A.D.2d 884 (Epstein v. Heiman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action by the vendees in a contract of sale of real property, to recover damages for breach of the contract, the vendor counterclaimed for specific performance. The appeal is from so much of an order as denied the vendor’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for summary judgment in his favor on the counterclaim. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs, and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 A.D.2d 884, 177 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-heiman-nyappdiv-1958.