Epstein v. Grand Union Co.

203 A.2d 257, 43 N.J. 251, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 148
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 21, 1964·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per CüRIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WeiNTRaub, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SOHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6. For reversal and remandment for new trial as io damages only — Justice Hall — 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Epstein v. Grand Union Co., 203 A.2d 257, 43 N.J. 251, 1964 N.J. LEXIS 148 (N.J. 1964).

203 A.2d 257 (Epstein v. Grand Union Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Catalane v. Gilian Instrument
638 A.2d 1341 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Tonelli v. Khanna
569 A.2d 282 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
Bishop v. Harski
465 A.2d 577 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)
Trentacost v. Brussel
395 A.2d 540 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)