Epstein v. Esserman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Epstein v. Esserman

147 S.E. 808, 39 Ga. App. 522, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 395

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 9, 1929

Docket19454

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 808 (Epstein v. Esserman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epstein v. Esserman, 147 S.E. 808, 39 Ga. App. 522, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 395 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the pleadings the court did not err in ruling that the defendants had the right to open and conclude the argument.

2. In the light of the facts of the ease and the charge of the court, none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, complaining of certain excerpts from the charge and of the failure to charge certain things, show error requiring a new trial.

3. The verdict was authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI