Epstein v. Epstein

84 S.W.2d 894, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 797
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 26, 1935
DocketNo. 9611.
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 84 S.W.2d 894 (Epstein v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epstein v. Epstein, 84 S.W.2d 894, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 797 (Tex. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

BICKETT, Chief Justice.

This appeal, involving only the question as to the custody of the minor child of the parties, is the outgrowth of a divorce suit, wherein the district court upon a trial without a jury granted a divorce to Rebecca Zelder Epstein from Meyer Epstein and awarded to her the custody of Ida Epstein, aged seven years.

The judgment of the trial court awarding the custody of a child, being addressed to the sound discretion of the court, will not be disturbed on appeal, unless it is so contrary to the great preponderance of the evidence as to show an abuse of discretion. There were before the court twenty-three witnesses, including both of the parties. Of this number, four physicians testified as witnesses for Epstein; and five for Mrs. Epstein. Neighbors and others in position to observe the facts testified in conflict. It would do no good to attempt to recapitulate the evidence. It is sufficient to say that we have carefully read the entire statement of facts and find therein ample evidence to sustain the judgment.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wooster v. Thompson
285 S.W.2d 954 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Bryant v. Birdsong
277 S.W.2d 922 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1955)
Cooksey v. Perkins
263 S.W.2d 952 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)
Tuel v. Tuel
252 S.W.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Beadles v. Beadles
251 S.W.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1952)
Cuellar v. Flores
238 S.W.2d 991 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1951)
Wade v. Shaughnessy
231 S.W.2d 494 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Crawford v. Crawford
197 S.W.2d 880 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Norris v. Norris
194 S.W.2d 813 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Thompson v. Haney
191 S.W.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1945)
Lanford v. Carruth
186 S.W.2d 368 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1945)
Rogers v. Mowry
183 S.W.2d 737 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1944)
Penn v. Abell
173 S.W.2d 483 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Miller v. Schneider
170 S.W.2d 301 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1943)
Puckett v. Helms
166 S.W.2d 210 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Mitchell v. Mitchell
168 S.W.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1942)
Lyle v. Lyle
141 S.W.2d 960 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1940)
Prendergast v. Prendergast
122 S.W.2d 710 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 S.W.2d 894, 1935 Tex. App. LEXIS 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epstein-v-epstein-texapp-1935.