Epstein v. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff
442 U.S. 907, 99 S. Ct. 2817
Opinion
Appeal from Sup. Ct. Pa. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Epstein v. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff, 442 U.S. 907, 99 S. Ct. 2817 (1979).
442 U.S. 907 (Epstein v. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Daniel Adams Associates, Inc. v. Rimbach Publishing, Inc.
519 A.2d 997 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Peugeot Motors of America, Inc. v. Stout
456 A.2d 1002 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
In re the Arbitration between Silverberg & Schwartz
81 A.D.2d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)