Epstein Bros. Carpet v. Gulf Ins. Co., No. Cv00-0435199s (Apr. 3, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Epstein Bros. Carpet v. Gulf Ins. Co., No. Cv00-0435199s (Apr. 3, 2001)

2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4794

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedApril 3, 2001

DocketNo. CV00-0435199S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4794 (Epstein Bros. Carpet v. Gulf Ins. Co., No. Cv00-0435199s (Apr. 3, 2001)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epstein Bros. Carpet v. Gulf Ins. Co., No. Cv00-0435199s (Apr. 3, 2001), 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 4794 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISIONON OBJECTION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SET-ASIDE MOTION TO REOPEN JUDGMENT On January 18, 2001 defendants filed their "Motion to Set-Aside Motion to Reopen Judgment" (Item 120 or 122 since it is between 121 and 123).

A hearing was held on March 29, 2001. Attorneys for plaintiff and defendants were both present.

They presented no justification to vary or contradict the findings that "the defendant waived any right to present defenses under P.B. § 17-34a" or to vary, or contradict the fact that Judge Silbert sustained plaintiff's objection to defendants "Notice of Intent to Present Defenses.

The objections by plaintiff to attempts by defendants to present evidence of claimed offenses are sustained. (113), (126) and (129).Clapper v. Clapper, 3 Conn. App. 637, 638 (1965). CT Page 4795

Objection sustained.

Reynolds, Judge Trial Referee

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI