Eproson v. Wheat

53 Cal. 715
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1879
DocketNo. 6355
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 53 Cal. 715 (Eproson v. Wheat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Eproson v. Wheat, 53 Cal. 715 (Cal. 1879).

Opinion

By the Court :

The bequest of one hundred dollars made by the will of the decedent to the petitioner, his surviving wife, was not accepted by her, and does not bar her claim to have a homestead set apart for the benefit of herself and the minor child of the deceased, as provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 1465. Nor does the agreement for a separation, made between the decedent in his lifetime and his wife, the petitioner, bar her claim to such homestead. Upon the facts appearing in this case, it was the duty of the Probate Court, under the provisions of the section of the Code above cited, to set apart for the use [720]*720of the surviving wife and the minor child of the deceased, the real estate, or a portion thereof, as a homestead.

Order reversed and cause remanded. Remittitur forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank
4 P.2d 263 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Lemp v. Lemp
184 P. 224 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1919)
Estate of Yoell
129 P. 999 (California Supreme Court, 1913)
On Rehearing
93 P. 31 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1908)
Estate of Lufkin
63 P. 469 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
Wickersham v. Comerford
31 P. 358 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Muir v. Howell
37 N.J. Eq. 39 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 Cal. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eproson-v-wheat-cal-1879.