Epps v. United States

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALICIA A. EPPS, Case No. 1:23-cv-510 Plaintiff, Cole, J. VS. Litkovitz, M.J. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., REPORT AND Defendants. RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs motion for default judgment. (Doc. 11). In view of the pending Reports recommending that plaintiff's complaint, amended complaint, and second amended complaint be dismissed (Docs. 4, 6, 13), it is RECOMMENDED that plaintiffs motion for default judgment be DENIED as moot. IT ISSO RECOMMENDED.

Date: 11/21/2023 Fora Xethont” Karen L. Litkovitz United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

ALICIA A. EPPS, Case No. 1:23-cv-510 Plaintiff, Cole, J. vs. Litkovitz, M.J.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants.

NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party’s objections WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).