Epps v. United States

112 F.2d 931, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4450
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided June 22, 1940·No. No. 2067·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Epps was indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced for a violation of the Liquor Enforcement Act of 1936, 27 U.S.C.A. § 223. The indictment charged that Epps unlawfully transported and imported into the state of Oklahoma intoxicating liquor containing more than four per cent of alcohol by volume, to wit, SO cases of whiskey, not accompanied by a written permit as required by ch. 16, O.S.L.1939, 37 Okl. St.Ann. § 41 et seq. Epps has appealed.

Epps contends that ch. 16, supra, is unconstitutional and, therefore, the Liquor Enforcement Act of 1936 is inapplicable to Oklahoma. See Dunn v. United States, 10 Cir., 98 F.2d 119, 117 A.L.R. 1302.

On authority of Hayes v. United States, 10 Cir., 112 F.2d 417, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Epps v. United States, 112 F.2d 931, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 4450 (10th Cir. 1940).

112 F.2d 931 (Epps v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.
137 F.2d 274 (Tenth Circuit, 1943)
Harris v. State
1942 OK CR 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1942)