Epps v. State
This text of 912 So. 2d 644 (Epps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Felton Ernest EPPS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Felton Ernest Epps, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. A defective notice of intent to habitualize is a procedural error which does not result in an illegal sentence which can be raised in a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion. Moore v. State, 810 So.2d 976 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); *645 Hollis v. State, 763 So.2d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
WARNER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
912 So. 2d 644, 2005 WL 2219268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epps-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.