Epps v. State
This text of 692 So. 2d 954 (Epps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.
In 1993, Defendant pled nolo contendere to various charges, including attempted felony murder. In 1996, defendant filed a motion for postconviction relief, arguing that his conviction should be vacated pursuant to State v. Gray, 654 So.2d 552 (Fla.1995). We affirm on the authority of State v. Woodley, 22 Fla. L. Weekly S174, — So.2d- [1997 WL 151879] (Fla. Apr. 3, 1997), in which the supreme court held that “Gray does not apply retroactively to those cases where the convictions had already become final before the issuance of the opinion.”
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
692 So. 2d 954, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3928, 1997 WL 180271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epps-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.