Epps v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Epps v. O'Brien

297 F. App'x 258

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 27, 2008·No. No. 08-6772·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Dory Michael Epps, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Epps v. O'Brien, No. 7:08-cv-00081-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 1924267 (W.D.Va. filed Apr. 30, 2008 & entered May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Dory Michael Epps, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Epps v. O'Brien, No. 7:08-cv-00081-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 1924267 (W.D.Va. filed Apr. 30, 2008 & entered May 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Epps v. O'Brien, 297 F. App'x 258 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

297 F. App'x 258 (Epps v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related