Epps v. Great Southern Truck Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Epps v. Great Southern Truck Co.

104 So. 2d 43, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2922

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 26, 1958

DocketNo. A-310

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 So. 2d 43 (Epps v. Great Southern Truck Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epps v. Great Southern Truck Co., 104 So. 2d 43, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2922 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the respondents’ motion to quash the petition for certiorari and upon the petitioner’s motion for an extension of “time for petitioner to file the testimony of record herein and/or the transcribed notes of the official court reporter allegedly taken” at a hearing before the trial court on the respondents’ motion for a summary judgment. The record now before this court in this case discloses that the petitioner has already been granted two extensions of time within which to file the record-on-appeal, one by the trial court and one by this court, and indicates that the petitioner has had ample opportunity to so file. The motion for further extension of time is denied. The respondents’ motion to quash the petition for certiorari is granted.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the respondents’ motion to quash the petition for certiorari and upon the petitioner’s motion for an extension of “time for petitioner to file the testimony of record herein and/or the transcribed notes of the official court reporter allegedly taken” at a hearing before the trial court on the respondents’ motion for a summary judgment. The record now before this court in this case discloses that the petitioner has already been granted two extensions of time within which to file the record-on-appeal, one by the trial court and one by this court, and indicates that the petitioner has had ample opportunity to so file. The motion for further extension of time is denied. The respondents’ motion to quash the petition for certiorari is granted.

STURGIS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD, and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 2d 43, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epps-v-great-southern-truck-co-fladistctapp-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack