Epps v. Gold
160 A.2d 810, 32 N.J. 344
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed essentially for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Ereund.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall and Schet tino—7.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Epps v. Gold, 160 A.2d 810, 32 N.J. 344 (N.J. 1960).
160 A.2d 810 (Epps v. Gold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.
469 A.2d 22 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1984)
Johnson v. Walter Kidde Constructors, Inc.
179 A.2d 25 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Celeste v. Progressive Silk Finishing Co.
178 A.2d 74 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)
Berkeyheiser v. Woolf
176 A.2d 497 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)