Eppinger v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA)

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Eppinger v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA)

691 S.E.2d 331, 302 Ga. App. 450, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 570, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 153

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 23, 2010

DocketA09A2054

StatusPublished

This text of 691 S.E.2d 331 (Eppinger v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eppinger v. Bank of America, N.A. (USA), 691 S.E.2d 331, 302 Ga. App. 450, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 570, 2010 Ga. App. LEXIS 153 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Martha L. Eppinger appeals from the tried court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Bank of America on a claim for a deficiency on a retail installment contract.

Appellee acknowledges that the notice letter attached to its *451 motion for summary judgment does not comply with OCGA § 10-1-36 (a), and “concedes that it has not, as a matter of law, shown compliance with OCGA § 10-1-36 [(a)]” and that “this case must be remanded to the trial court.”

Decided February 23, 2010. Don E. Snow, for appellant. Dennis E. Henry, for appellee.

We therefore do not reach appellant’s remaining enumeration of error.

Judgment reversed.

Phipps and Bernes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI