Epperson v. State
This text of 97 S.W.2d 194 (Epperson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of a mule, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of four years.
There are no hills of exception or a statement of facts in the record. Hence the only matter to he considered is the sufficiency of the indictment, which seems to us to be in due form and charges the offense for which he was convicted.
Therefore it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be, and the same is, in all things affirmed.
PER CURIAM.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 S.W.2d 194, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epperson-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.