Home/Supreme Court of Delaware/Epperson v. State

Epperson v. State

992 A.2d 1236, 2010 WL 1463233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Epperson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 A.3d 429 →
Supreme Court of Delaware·Decided April 29, 2010·No. 52, 2010·Published

Opinion

KEVIN EPPERSON, Defendant Below-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below-Appellee.

No. 52, 2010.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Submitted: March 5, 2010.
Decided: April 13, 2010.
Corrected: April 29, 2010.

Before BERGER, JACOBS, and RIDGELY, Justices.

ORDER

JACK B. JACOBS, Justice.

This 29th day of April 2010, after careful consideration of appellant's opening brief and the State's motion to affirm, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned decision dated January 21, 2010. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's fifteenth motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Epperson v. State, 992 A.2d 1236, 2010 WL 1463233 (Del. 2010).

992 A.2d 1236 (Epperson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.