Epperson v. Stancill
181 S.E. 170, 180 Ga. 857, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 584
This text of 181 S.E. 170 (Epperson v. Stancill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Epperson v. Stancill, 181 S.E. 170, 180 Ga. 857, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 584 (Ga. 1935).
Opinion
1. The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. Sill v. Sill, 149 Ga. 50 (99 S. E. 31) ; Landrum v. Rivers, 148 Ga. 774 (98 S. E. 477).
2. Tile portions of the charge excepted to were not erroneous on the grounds taken in the motion for new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ray v. Sears
140 S.E.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Patrick v. Holliday
36 S.E.2d 769 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 170, 180 Ga. 857, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epperson-v-stancill-ga-1935.