Epperson v. Mullins
This text of 811 F.2d 604 (Epperson v. Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
811 F.2d 604
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Lawrence EPPERSON, Madeline Epperson, Kenneth Epperson and
Patsy D. Price, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Steve MULLINS; Larry Mullins, Sullivan County Sheriff's
Department; Patrick Howard; Sheriff Mike
Gardner; Damion Gordon; Raymond
Kanipe; and Bruce Bullis,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-6105.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 16, 1986.
Before JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon consideration of appellees' motion to dismiss because of lack of jurisdiction. Appellants have responded.
Appellants have appealed from an order denying their motion for entry of default judgment. Such an order is non-appealable pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1291. McNutt v. Cardox Corp., 329 F.2d 107 (6th Cir.1964). This Court is without jurisdiction in this matter.
It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
811 F.2d 604, 1986 WL 18574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epperson-v-mullins-ca6-1986.