Epperson v. Kitchens

58 S.E. 501, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 356
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1907
Docket452
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 S.E. 501 (Epperson v. Kitchens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epperson v. Kitchens, 58 S.E. 501, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 356 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. After the petition for certiorari has been sanctioned and the answer of the magistrate filed, and such answer supports the allegations of the petition, the certiorari will not be dismissed because of a defect in the affidavit of the plaintiff in certiorari, verifying the petition.

2. Where the superior court, on certiorari, set aside a verdict rendered in a justice’s court, and ordered a new trial because “the ends of justice require it,” the voice of the evidence demanding such verdict, to bo heard in this court, would have to be very clear and very loud.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Horton-Hughes Furniture Co. v. Broad Street Hotel Co.
95 S.E. 373 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 S.E. 501, 2 Ga. App. 322, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epperson-v-kitchens-gactapp-1907.