Epperson v. Dutton
157 S.E.2d 774, 223 Ga. 727, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 674
Opinion
This is purely and simply an effort to correct- alleged errors of law in a case heretofore affirmed in Epperson v. State, 223 Ga. 253 (154 SE2d 237), and the writ of habeas corpus is not available to applicant for a second review. Morris v. Aderhold, 201 Ga. 533 (40 SE2d 747); Peppers v. Balkcom, 218 Ga. 749 (130 SE2d 709). The judgment remanding the applicant to the custody of the proper State officials must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Epperson v. Dutton, 157 S.E.2d 774, 223 Ga. 727, 1967 Ga. LEXIS 674 (Ga. 1967).
157 S.E.2d 774 (Epperson v. Dutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peppers v. Balkcom
130 S.E.2d 709 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1963)
Morris v. Aderhold
40 S.E.2d 747 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1946)
Epperson v. State
154 S.E.2d 237 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1967)