Epp v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Epp v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

258 A.D. 120, 15 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6375

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 1, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 258 A.D. 120 (Epp v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Epp v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co., 258 A.D. 120, 15 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6375 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It would seem that the petitioner does not seek to intervene in the causes of action which have been asserted by the plaintiffs but seeks to assert in this action causes of action of her own which present questions of law or fact similar to those now at issue in the pending action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 209.) Since the defendant is entitled to be informed of the nature of the claims asserted against it by the petitioner and to interpose an answer thereto, the order should be modified to require the petitioner Betty Heller to serve a supplemental complaint.

As so modified the order should be affirmed, without costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order unanimously modified by requiring the petitioner Betty Heller to serve a supplemental complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It would seem that the petitioner does not seek to intervene in the causes of action which have been asserted by the plaintiffs but seeks to assert in this action causes of action of her own which present questions of law or fact similar to those now at issue in the pending action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 209.) Since the defendant is entitled to be informed of the nature of the claims asserted against it by the petitioner and to interpose an answer thereto, the order should be modified to require the petitioner Betty Heller to serve a supplemental complaint.

As so modified the order should be affirmed, without costs. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Order unanimously modified by requiring the petitioner Betty Heller to serve a supplemental complaint, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 A.D. 120, 15 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epp-v-title-guarantee-trust-co-nyappdiv-1939.