Epling v. Epling

64 Ky. 74, 1 Bush 74, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 90
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedDecember 18, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 64 Ky. 74 (Epling v. Epling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epling v. Epling, 64 Ky. 74, 1 Bush 74, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 90 (Ky. Ct. App. 1866).

Opinion

CHIEF JUSTICE PETERS

delivered the opinion op the court:

Appellant brought this action in the court below to obtain a divorce from appellee, which was refused by said court.

[75]*75Section 1, article 3, chapter 47 (2 vol. R. S., p. 17), provides that courts having chancery jurisdiction may decree a divorce to the party not in fault. 1. For abandonment, or like separation by one party from the other for one year.

The petition fails to allege that appellant’s wife abandoned or separated from him without his fault, as required by the statute above referred to. If a party for mere separation would be entitled to a divorce, he might so conduct himself towards his wife, when, for the most trivial cause, or even without any cause at all, but from mere caprice, he should incline to a dissolution of the marriage contract, • as to render it impossible for her to live with him in peace or safety; and then ask the chancellor to decree him a divorce for a separation, which he had provoked in order to accomplish his wicked purpose; but it is sufficient that the statute only provides this remedy for a party not in fault, and the court has no power, if it had-the inclination, to require less. Wherefore, as appellant had failed to allege and prove the material fact, his petition was properly dismissed.

Wherefore, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Compton v. Compton
54 S.W.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Belcher v. Belcher
45 S.W.2d 841 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Lewis v. Lewis
266 S.W. 16 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Watkins v. Watkins
259 S.W. 20 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Yeager v. Yeager
247 S.W. 5 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Manning v. Manning
221 S.W. 522 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1920)
Newman v. Newman
98 N.E. 507 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1912)
Owsley v. Owsley
10 Ky. Op. 667 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Ky. 74, 1 Bush 74, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epling-v-epling-kyctapp-1866.