Episcopal Church Home of Western New York, Inc. v. Bulb Man, Inc.

274 A.D.2d 961, 710 N.Y.S.2d 503, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7657
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 7, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 274 A.D.2d 961 (Episcopal Church Home of Western New York, Inc. v. Bulb Man, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Episcopal Church Home of Western New York, Inc. v. Bulb Man, Inc., 274 A.D.2d 961, 710 N.Y.S.2d 503, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7657 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that defendant breached the implied warranty of merchantability by selling plaintiff defective ballasts for light fixtures. The implied warranty of merchantability provides that goods will be fit for the ordinary purposes for which they are used (see, UCC 2-314 [2] [c]; Gordon v Ford Motor Co., 260 AD2d 164, 165; Butler v Interlake Corp., 244 AD2d 913, 915). Supreme Court properly determined, following a bench trial, [962]*962that defendant breached that warranty. Plaintiff established that, according to defendant, the accepted failure rate for the fixtures was 10%. Plaintiff presented proof that at least 15% of the fixtures purchased were defective, thereby establishing that the goods were not fit for the ordinary purposes for which they are used (see, UCC 2-314 [2] [c]).

We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in awarding plaintiff damages in the amount of $17,758. In determining the amount of damages, the court failed to comply with UCC 2-714 (2), which sets forth the formula for calculating damages in a breach of warranty action “unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.” Plaintiff failed to prove special circumstances. Defendant concedes that, based upon that formula, plaintiff is entitled to recover damages in the amount of $9,910, and thus we modify the judgment accordingly. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Stathacos, J.H.O. — Contract.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ANGONA, SUSAN v. CITY OF SYRACUSE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014
Angona v. City of Syracuse
118 A.D.3d 1318 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
J.C. Construction Management Corp. v. Nassau-Suffolk Lumber & Supply Corp.
15 A.D.3d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 A.D.2d 961, 710 N.Y.S.2d 503, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/episcopal-church-home-of-western-new-york-inc-v-bulb-man-inc-nyappdiv-2000.