Epic Security Corp. v. Department of State, Division of Licensing Services

167 A.D.2d 183, 561 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13507

This text of 167 A.D.2d 183 (Epic Security Corp. v. Department of State, Division of Licensing Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epic Security Corp. v. Department of State, Division of Licensing Services, 167 A.D.2d 183, 561 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13507 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Determination of the respondent Department of State dated August 3, 1989, which, inter alia, indefinitely suspended the license of petitioners Epic Security Corporation as a private investigator and Mark J. Lerner and Patrick J. Lappin as qualifying officers, is unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of Sup Ct, NY County, Norman C. Ryp, J., entered Jan. 29, 1990) is unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements.

Upon review of the record we find that there was substantial evidence to support the respondent’s determination that the insignia worn as shoulder patches on the uniforms of employees of petitioner, Epic Security Corporation, was not in conformity with the requirements of General Business Law [184]*184§ 80 and the regulations promulgated thereunder (19 NYCRR 171.1 et seq.). Petitioner violated these provisions by not obtaining prior written approval from the Division of Licensing Services for the use of such insignia. Petitioners’ attack upon the constitutionality of the statute and the regulations is wholly without merit. Moreover, to the extent that petitioners seek to review a subsequent denial of authorization by respondent with respect to petitioners’ proposed use of substitute patches, petitioners have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies pursuant to CPLR 7804, and such denial is not ripe for review by this court. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Ellerin and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 7804
New York CVP § 7804

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 183, 561 N.Y.S.2d 251, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epic-security-corp-v-department-of-state-division-of-licensing-services-nyappdiv-1990.