Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Ephram v. State

Ephram v. State

65 S.E. 57, 6 Ga. App. 433, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 332
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 6, 1909·No. 1891·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

The judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, either upon the general grounds, or upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of assault and battery, from city court of Blakely— Judge Jordan. April 23, 1909. Submitted June 9, Decided July 6, 1909. Hawes & Pottle, for plaintiff in error. Waller Park, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ephram v. State, 65 S.E. 57, 6 Ga. App. 433, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 332 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

65 S.E. 57 (Ephram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
227 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)