Ephram v. State

65 S.E. 57, 6 Ga. App. 433, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 332
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 6, 1909
Docket1891
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 S.E. 57 (Ephram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ephram v. State, 65 S.E. 57, 6 Ga. App. 433, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 332 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, either upon the general grounds, or upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Accusation of assault and battery, from city court of Blakely— Judge Jordan. April 23, 1909. Submitted June 9, Decided July 6, 1909. Hawes & Pottle, for plaintiff in error. Waller Park, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
227 S.E.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 57, 6 Ga. App. 433, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ephram-v-state-gactapp-1909.