Ephraim v. Hogsten
This text of 584 F. App'x 65 (Ephraim v. Hogsten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lionell Elijah Ephraim appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition and denying his Rule 59 motion of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Ephraim leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ephraim v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-02339 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 4, 2014; June 27, 2014). We dispense with, oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 F. App'x 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ephraim-v-hogsten-ca4-2014.