Ephraim Haspel v. Bonnaz, Singer & Hand Embroiderers, Tuckers, Stitchers & Pleaters Union, Local 66

216 F.2d 192
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 29, 1954
Docket23051
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 216 F.2d 192 (Ephraim Haspel v. Bonnaz, Singer & Hand Embroiderers, Tuckers, Stitchers & Pleaters Union, Local 66) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ephraim Haspel v. Bonnaz, Singer & Hand Embroiderers, Tuckers, Stitchers & Pleaters Union, Local 66, 216 F.2d 192 (2d Cir. 1954).

Opinion

216 F.2d 192

Ephraim HASPEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BONNAZ, SINGER & HAND EMBROIDERERS, TUCKERS, STITCHERS &
PLEATERS UNION, LOCAL 66, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12, Docket 23051.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 15, 1954.
Decided Oct. 29, 1954.

George E. Reynolds, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

Elias Lieberman, New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before CHASE, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the opinion below. D.C., 112 F.Supp. 944.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F.2d 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ephraim-haspel-v-bonnaz-singer-hand-embroiderers-tuckers-stitchers-ca2-1954.