Epgt Texas Pipeline, L.P. Now Known as Enterprise Texas Pipeline, L. P. v. Abel Villanueva

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 18, 2008
Docket13-08-00229-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Epgt Texas Pipeline, L.P. Now Known as Enterprise Texas Pipeline, L. P. v. Abel Villanueva (Epgt Texas Pipeline, L.P. Now Known as Enterprise Texas Pipeline, L. P. v. Abel Villanueva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Epgt Texas Pipeline, L.P. Now Known as Enterprise Texas Pipeline, L. P. v. Abel Villanueva, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-08-00229-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

EPGT TEXAS PIPELINE, L.P. NOW KNOWN AS ENTERPRISE TEXAS PIPELINE, L. P. , Appellant,

v.

ABEL VILLANUEVA, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, EPGT Texas Pipeline, L.P. now known as Enterprise Texas Pipeline,

L.P., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo

County, Texas, in cause number C-690-07-I. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the trial court has granted a new trial which renders the appeal

moot. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to

dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring

same. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 18th day of September, 2008.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Epgt Texas Pipeline, L.P. Now Known as Enterprise Texas Pipeline, L. P. v. Abel Villanueva, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/epgt-texas-pipeline-lp-now-known-as-enterprise-tex-texapp-2008.