Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.

267 F. App'x 935
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 599 F.3d 1325
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 30, 2008·No. No. 2008-1058·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Enzo Biochem, Inc. et al. (Enzo) moves for a 60-day extension of time to file their brief or, in the alternative, to dismiss without prejudice their appeal of the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp., No. 3:04-CV-929. Enzo moves for dismissal without prejudice to reinstatement of the appeal. Enzo moves to withdraw the two above-listed motions and moves to dismiss its appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Enzo states that Applera Corp. et al. consent

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to withdraw two motions is granted.

[936]*936(2) The motion to dismiss is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp., 267 F. App'x 935 (Fed. Cir. 2008).

267 F. App'x 935 (Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Applera Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.