Enzler v. Saretsky
This text of 1 A.D.2d 803 (Enzler v. Saretsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The suggested ambiguity requiring interpretation and application of the order may appropriately be made the subject of a ruling at Special Term, Part II. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 803, 149 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enzler-v-saretsky-nyappdiv-1956.