Enzler v. Saretsky

1 A.D.2d 803, 149 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6361

This text of 1 A.D.2d 803 (Enzler v. Saretsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enzler v. Saretsky, 1 A.D.2d 803, 149 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6361 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The suggested ambiguity requiring interpretation and application of the order may appropriately be made the subject of a ruling at Special Term, Part II. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peck, P. J., Breitel, Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 803, 149 N.Y.S.2d 265, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enzler-v-saretsky-nyappdiv-1956.