Enyew v. Ashcroft

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 15, 2004
• Docket: 04-1143
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1143

ROMAN TEMESGEN ENYEW,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-477-509)

Submitted: August 18, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roman Temesgen Enyew, Petitioner Pro Se. Arthur H. Gottlieb, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Baltimore, Maryland; Jennifer J. Keeney, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Roman Temesgen Enyew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals dismissing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial

of her applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have reviewed

the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review on

the reasoning of the Board. See In re: Enyew, No. A79-477-509

(B.I.A. Jan. 5, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

- 2 -