Environamics v. Thelco

District Court, D. New Hampshire·Decided December 2, 1997·No. CV-96-068-M·Published

Opinion

Environamics v. Thelco CV-96-068-M 12/02/97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Environamics Corporation v. Civil No. 96-68-M Thelco Corporation

O R D E R

Environamics Corporation moves to dismiss Thelco Corporation's Consumer Protection Act claim on grounds that the Act does not apply to transactions between business entities. Though acknowledging that controlling authority is directly contrary, see Eastern Mountain Platform Tennis, Inc. v. Sherwin Williams, C o ., 40 F.3d 492 (1st Cir. 1994), Environamics nevertheless invites this court to disregard that authority, as well as other persuasive authority, on the basis of several New Hampshire Superior Court decisions that do not present a consistent interpretation of the Act. The court obviously will decline the invitation.

Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (document no. 33) is denied.

SO ORDERED.

Steven J. McAuliffe

United States District Judge

December 2, 1997 cc: Christopher Cole, Esq.

Daniel P. Schwarz, Esq.

Rosemary A. Macero, Esq.

Laurin D. Quiat, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Environamics v. Thelco, (D.N.H. 1997).

Environamics v. Thelco (Environamics v. Thelco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.