Enviroclean Services, LLC v. CEM, Inc.

12 A.D.3d 1044, 784 N.Y.S.2d 459
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Enviroclean Services, LLC v. CEM, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 A.D.3d 1042
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 2004·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J.), entered November 6, 2003. The order granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and awarded plaintiff judgment against defendant in the amount of $52,187 plus accrued interest.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present—Pigott, Jr., PJ., Hurlbutt, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enviroclean Services, LLC v. CEM, Inc., 12 A.D.3d 1044, 784 N.Y.S.2d 459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 1044 (Enviroclean Services, LLC v. CEM, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)