Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. D. Nicole Enterprises, LLC
This text of 677 F. App'x 312 (Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. D. Nicole Enterprises, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
DuShawn Thomas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment granting plaintiff Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s motion for voluntary dismissal of Thomas under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) from its trademark infringement action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. Westlands Water Dist. v. United States, 100 F.3d 94, 96 (9th Cir. 1996), We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by granting Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s motion for voluntary dismissal because Thomas failed to identify any “plain legal prejudice” that she suffered as a result of the dismissal. See id. (factors for evaluating motion for voluntary dismissal).
Because we affirm on the basis of plaintiffs motion for voluntary dismissal of Thomas, we do not consider Thomas’ contentions concerning the merits of her counterclaims.
We reject as without merit Thomas’ contentions that the motion was granted based on Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s lack of candor.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 F. App'x 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/entrepreneur-media-inc-v-d-nicole-enterprises-llc-ca9-2017.