Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. D. Nicole Enterprises, LLC

677 F. App'x 312
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 30, 2017·No. 14-55473·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

DuShawn Thomas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment granting plaintiff Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s motion for voluntary dismissal of Thomas under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) from its trademark infringement action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion. Westlands Water Dist. v. United States, 100 F.3d 94, 96 (9th Cir. 1996), We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by granting Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s motion for voluntary dismissal because Thomas failed to identify any “plain legal prejudice” that she suffered as a result of the dismissal. See id. (factors for evaluating motion for voluntary dismissal).

Because we affirm on the basis of plaintiffs motion for voluntary dismissal of Thomas, we do not consider Thomas’ contentions concerning the merits of her counterclaims.

We reject as without merit Thomas’ contentions that the motion was granted based on Entrepreneur Media, Inc.’s lack of candor.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. D. Nicole Enterprises, LLC, 677 F. App'x 312 (9th Cir. 2017).

677 F. App'x 312 (Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. D. Nicole Enterprises, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baron v. Shinn
D. Arizona, 2022