Entertainment Marketing Concepts, Inc. v. Barrett

657 So. 2d 1287, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8267, 1995 WL 453999
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1995·No. No. 94-2787·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse an order striking a defendant’s pleadings for failure to respond to discovery-orders under the principles announced in Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1994); Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983); Beauchamp v. Collins, 500 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). It was an abuse of discretion to enter such an order and deny rehearing thereof as to the appellant when the cause was not at issue as to the other defendants. This reversal is without prejudice to the trial court entering less severe sanctions against either the appellant and/or its counsel.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Entertainment Marketing Concepts, Inc. v. Barrett, 657 So. 2d 1287, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8267, 1995 WL 453999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

657 So. 2d 1287 (Entertainment Marketing Concepts, Inc. v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kozel v. Ostendorf
629 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Beauchamp v. Collins
500 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Mercer v. Raine
443 So. 2d 944 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)