Enterprise Wall Paper Co. v. Rantoul Co.
This text of 103 A. 923 (Enterprise Wall Paper Co. v. Rantoul Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Until the paper manufactured by the Marley Mills Corporation under its contract of May 13,1916, with the appellant, the Enterprise Wall Paper Company, was actually delivered to that company, it was clearly liable to seizure by execution creditors of the corporation, for the law will not permit any device to elude the principle which forbids a lien to be created on chattels as a security separate from their possession: Jenkins v. Eichelberger, 4 Watts 121; Prichett et al. v. Cook, 62 Pa. 193. The judgment for the defendant in the feigned issue, having been properly entered non obstante veredicto, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 A. 923, 260 Pa. 540, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enterprise-wall-paper-co-v-rantoul-co-pa-1918.