ENTERPRISE FM TRUST v. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS INC

District Court, D. Maine·Decided March 9, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-00358·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

ENTERPRISE FM TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 2:19-cv-00358-GZS -vs- ) ) GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL ) SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER

On December 31, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered an Order granting Plaintiff Enterprise FM Trust’s (“EFM”) Motion for Appointment of a Receiver (ECF No. 14). In this Order, it was determined that Defendant had “failed to provide any assurance that it ha[d] secured [certain] vehicles for Plaintiff, and given the uncertainty as to the current location of the vehicles, a receiver would assist Plaintiff in its efforts to protect its interest in the vehicles.” (Id. at 4.) The Court directed EFM to submit additional information regarding the proposed receiver and a proposed order. Also, on December 31, 2019, the Magistrate Judge entered a separate Recommended Decision on EFM’s Motion for Default Judgment (ECF No. 13). The Court subsequently adopted this Recommended Decision on January 21, 2020 and, as a result, final judgment (ECF No. 17) entered on January 23, 2020. Pursuant to the Court’s January 21, 2020 Order (ECF No. 16), Defendant was required to return all lease vehicles to Plaintiff by February 20, 2020. After the entry of the final default judgment, the Magistrate Judge determined that the appointment of a receiver would be governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 70 and so informed EFM . Thereafter, EFM filed the pending Supplemental Motion for the Appointment of a Receiver (ECF No. 20). In the Motion, EFM represented that Defendant had not complied with the Court’s order to return the vehicles. Defendant was served a copy of the pending Motion but has filed no response by the March 5, 2020 deadline. (See

Procedural Order (ECF No. 21).) The Court construes the Supplemental Motion as a request for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 70. Having reviewed EFM’s submissions and the entire record, the Court now GRANTS the Supplemental Motion.1 The Court hereby appoints Windsor Associates, LLC, of Portland, Maine, as Receiver ("Receiver") of Defendant Global Environmental Solutions, Inc. (“Global Environmental”), subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Powers. The Receiver is hereby authorized and empowered to do the following until further order of this Court: a) To take all actions as it may determine necessary in its reasonable discretion

to locate, repossess, retrieve, manage, protect, and preserve the vehicles EFM leased to Global Environmental pursuant to the Master Equity Lease Agreement attached as Exhibit 1 to the Complaint in this matter (the “Complaint”), which vehicles are listed in Exhibit 2 to the Complaint (the “Vehicles”) (see ECF No. 1, ¶¶ 6-7; ECF Nos. 1-1 and 1-2), and to collect monies and receive all other benefits, including, without limitation, all rents, income, debts, obligations, revenues, accounts receivable, and profits owing or accruing to

1 The Court notes that the issue of receivership has been ably handled by the Magistrate Judge to date. However, in light of the First Circuit’s decision in ML-CFC 2007-6 Puerto Rico Properties, LLC v. BPP Retail Properties, LLC, No. 18-1405, 2020 WL 966257 (1st Cir. Feb. 28, 2020) and given the default in this matter, the interests of judicial efficiency are best served by this Court resolving the remaining receivership issues. The Court notes that its ruling incorporates a de novo determination of all of the matters resolved in the Magistrate Judge’s earlier Memorandum Decision on Motion to Appoint Receiver (ECF No. 14) and the Court adopts and incorporates that Decision as part of its reasoning in this Order. Global Environmental (the “Global Environmental Funds”), from any third party regarding the Vehicles and apply the same in the manner set forth in paragraph 1(d) below; b) To take actions to enforce the January 21, 2020 Order Affirming the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 16) and subsequent Judgment

entered on January 23, 2020 (ECF No. 17) (together, the “Judgment”), directing Global Environmental to return the Vehicles to EFM. c) To access, examine and, as necessary, make copies of the records, documents, data, and accounts of Global Environmental or in Global Environmental’s possession, custody, or control, whether electronic or hard copy, relating to the Vehicles, and report to the Court on the same during the pendency of the receivership; d) To apply the Global Environmental Funds in the following manner: i. Payment of the compensation, costs, expenses and fees of the Receiver and attorneys for and agents of the Receiver incurred in locating and returning the Vehicles; and

ii. Payment of the ordinary and necessary expenses of locating, retrieving, managing, protecting and preserving the Vehicles, including, without limitation, the payment of insurance premiums and other expenses. e) To bring legal action, if necessary, in order to recover the Vehicles and/or collect the Global Environmental Funds, and to settle and compromise any of such Funds whenever the Receiver shall deem it advisable to do so, upon such terms and conditions as appear to it to be justifiable, after notice to and consultation with EFM; f) To bring legal action, if necessary, in order to compel third parties to produce documents and/or information helpful or necessary to the Receiver’s exercise of its powers as set forth herein, and to compel the compliance, by subpoena or otherwise, of third parties on behalf of Global Environmental and any other party or entity subject to the receivership; g) To step into Global Environmental’s shoes with respect to its rights under contracts with third parties regarding the Vehicles, including, without limitation, its right

to negotiate and enter into contracts, and to renegotiate and terminate contracts regarding the Vehicles; and to compromise obligations owing to and by Global Environmental, after notice to and consultation with EFM, where it appears in the Receiver’s best judgment to be in the best interest of preserving the Vehicles; h) To pay the agents, attorneys and employees whom the Receiver hires or continues in employment such compensation for their services as provided herein or, where not specifically provided, as the Receiver deems proper; i) To employ an attorney if, in the judgment of the Receiver, legal advice, counsel, or consultation is required in connection with the performance of the duties of the Receiver, and to prosecute actions to collect any sums or obligations due as appears

advisable; and j) To do anything the Receiver reasonably deems necessary to perform the duties set forth above. The Receiver shall have broad discretion to exercise its powers as it deems proper in its business judgment. The common-law-business-judgment rule shall apply to all decisions made by the Receiver. The fact that the Receiver has the power to perform an act does not require the Receiver to perform that act if it is contrary to the Receiver’s business judgment. 2. Compensation of Receiver. a) Hourly Rate. The Receiver will be paid the sum of $300.00 per hour for all Work (as hereinafter defined) performed by Windsor Associates, LLC (John C. Thibodeau). The Receiver will be paid $125.00 per hour for all Work performed by the

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ENTERPRISE FM TRUST v. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS INC, (D. Me. 2020).

ENTERPRISE FM TRUST v. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS INC (ENTERPRISE FM TRUST v. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS INC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related