Entenmann v. Lyttle

180 A.D.2d 778, 581 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2753

This text of 180 A.D.2d 778 (Entenmann v. Lyttle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Entenmann v. Lyttle, 180 A.D.2d 778, 581 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered May 23, 1990.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, [779]*779for reasons stated by Justice Tanenbaum at the Supreme Court. Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A.D.2d 778, 581 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/entenmann-v-lyttle-nyappdiv-1992.