Ente v. Loewenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ente v. Loewenthal

237 A.D. 811

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D. 811 (Ente v. Loewenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ente v. Loewenthal, 237 A.D. 811 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; Merrell and Townley, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the testimony presented a question of fact as to the negligence of the defendant in maintaining a car with a defective door, and in making an abrupt turn when the plaintiff had left his seat and was in a position where such movement of the car might result in his being thrown against the defective door.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.; Merrell and Townley, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial on the ground that the testimony presented a question of fact as to the negligence of the defendant in maintaining a car with a defective door, and in making an abrupt turn when the plaintiff had left his seat and was in a position where such movement of the car might result in his being thrown against the defective door.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ente-v-loewenthal-nyappdiv-1932.