Ensley v. Donnelly, Collector of Revenue
This text of 190 F.2d 59 (Ensley v. Donnelly, Collector of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal from the decision of the district judge that it could not he deducted, presents as the sole question whether a note to the extent of $6,000.00, 1 given by a father to his son, may be deducted as a claim against the estate, incurred bona fide and for an adequate and full consideration in money or money’s worth, within the meaning of Section 812(b)(3) I.R.C., 26 U.S. C.A. § 812(b)(3).
Upon authority of Taft v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 304 U.S. 351, 58 S.Ct. 891, 82 L.Ed. 1393, the question must be answered in the negative and the judgment must be affirmed.
Affirmed.
. The circumstances under which the note was given are these:
Some years prior to his death, Thaddeus L. Ensley instituted the custom of making an annual donation of $500 in cash to his daughter and a note in the sum of $500 each year to his son, George T. Ensley.
The system followed with respect to these notes was that the first year the son received a note for $500; the second year he received a note for $1000, and returned to his father the prior note in the amount of $500; the third year he received a note for $1,500 and returned the prior note in the amount of $1,000. This procedure continued each year until at the time of the father’s death the current note held by the son was in the amount of $0,000.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 F.2d 59, 40 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 828, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ensley-v-donnelly-collector-of-revenue-ca5-1951.