Home/Eleventh Circuit/Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels

Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels

60 F.3d 717, 1994 WL 697621
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 14, 1994·No. No. 91-7799·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ON SUGGESTIONS OF REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestions of Rehearing En Bane are DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels, 60 F.3d 717, 1994 WL 697621 (11th Cir. 1994).

60 F.3d 717 (Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. Donald Nixon William Moss Alvin Mahaffey, Jr., Birmingham Fire Fighters Association 117 Birmingham Association of City Employees, Intervenors v. George Seibels, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Birmingham, John W. Martin Major Florence Ida McGruder Sam Coar, Birmingham Fire Fighters Association 117 Birmingham Association of City Employees Billy Gray, Intervenors v. City of Birmingham George C. Seibels, Jr. Mayor of Birmingham Jefferson County Personnel Board, United States of America, Birmingham Fire Fighters Association 117, Intervenors, Robert K. Wilks James A. Bennett Floyd E. Click James D. Morgan Joel Alan Day, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. Jefferson County, City of Birmingham and George G. Seibels
60 F.3d 717 (Eleventh Circuit, 1994)