Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad
158 N.E.2d 504, 6 N.Y.2d 723
This text of 158 N.E.2d 504 (Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Enslein v. Hudson & Manhattan Railroad, 158 N.E.2d 504, 6 N.Y.2d 723 (N.Y. 1959).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs to plaintiff against both defendants and with costs to defendant Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company against defendant, the Peelle Company. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Daliendo v. Johnson
147 A.D.2d 312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Ebanks v. New York City Transit Authority
118 A.D.2d 363 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Birdsall v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
109 A.D.2d 969 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.
327 A.2d 94 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
Gilbert v. Korvette's, Inc.
299 A.2d 356 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)
Greet v. Otis Elevator Company
187 A.2d 896 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
158 N.E.2d 504, 6 N.Y.2d 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enslein-v-hudson-manhattan-railroad-ny-1959.