Ensign v. McKinney

5 N.Y.S. 464, 51 Hun 637, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3046
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 11, 1889
StatusPublished

This text of 5 N.Y.S. 464 (Ensign v. McKinney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ensign v. McKinney, 5 N.Y.S. 464, 51 Hun 637, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3046 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Opinion

Ho opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on opinion of Daniels, J., at special term; Bradley, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.Y.S. 464, 51 Hun 637, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ensign-v-mckinney-nysupct-1889.