Ensign v. Hoffield & Geissler
4 A. 189, 2 Sadler 504
Opinion
This was a feigned issue to try the title to certain personal property levied on by the plaintiffs in error, as the property of Tyler & Scouller. We discover no error in the law as declared by the court, and the facts were submitted to the jury in a clear and correct charge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ensign v. Hoffield & Geissler, 4 A. 189, 2 Sadler 504 (Pa. 1886).
4 A. 189 (Ensign v. Hoffield & Geissler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blount-Decker Lumber Co. v. Farmers' Lumber Co.
211 S.W. 247 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Jaffrey v. Brown
29 F. 476 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 1886)