Ensign v. Hoffield & Geissler
4 A. 189, 2 Sadler 504
This text of 4 A. 189 (Ensign v. Hoffield & Geissler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ensign v. Hoffield & Geissler, 4 A. 189, 2 Sadler 504 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
This was a feigned issue to try the title to certain personal property levied on by the plaintiffs in error, as the property of Tyler & Scouller. We discover no error in the law as declared by the court, and the facts were submitted to the jury in a clear and correct charge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blount-Decker Lumber Co. v. Farmers' Lumber Co.
211 S.W. 247 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Jaffrey v. Brown
29 F. 476 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia, 1886)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 A. 189, 2 Sadler 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ensign-v-hoffield-geissler-pa-1886.