Ensey v. Culhane
This text of 706 A.2d 1334 (Ensey v. Culhane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Defendants’ have appealed a Superior Court order denying their motion for summary judgment in this case. Such orders are interlocutory, and are generally not appeal-able. Defendants, however, claim that in light of the significance of the issues involved, they should have the right to an immediate appeal from the Superior Court ruling in this case. They are joined in this contention by amici curiae, the governor, Rhode Island Interlocal Risk Management Trust, and the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns.
After careful consideration of the contentions of the defendants and of the amici curiae, we affirm that appellate review of rulings of this nature is properly obtainable by petition for writ of certiorari. Therefore, permitting defendants an interlocutory appeal is unnecessary in this case.
Accordingly, the appeal is denied and dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 A.2d 1334, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 86, 1998 WL 102385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ensey-v-culhane-ri-1998.