Ensey v. Culhane

706 A.2d 1334, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 86, 1998 WL 102385
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedFebruary 12, 1998
DocketNo. 97-494-A
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 706 A.2d 1334 (Ensey v. Culhane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ensey v. Culhane, 706 A.2d 1334, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 86, 1998 WL 102385 (R.I. 1998).

Opinion

ORDER

Defendants’ have appealed a Superior Court order denying their motion for summary judgment in this case. Such orders are interlocutory, and are generally not appeal-able. Defendants, however, claim that in light of the significance of the issues involved, they should have the right to an immediate appeal from the Superior Court ruling in this case. They are joined in this contention by amici curiae, the governor, Rhode Island Interlocal Risk Management Trust, and the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns.

After careful consideration of the contentions of the defendants and of the amici curiae, we affirm that appellate review of rulings of this nature is properly obtainable by petition for writ of certiorari. Therefore, permitting defendants an interlocutory appeal is unnecessary in this case.

Accordingly, the appeal is denied and dismissed.

BOURCIER, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fayle v. Traudt
813 A.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2003)
Halloran v. State
729 A.2d 709 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 A.2d 1334, 1998 R.I. LEXIS 86, 1998 WL 102385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ensey-v-culhane-ri-1998.