Ensell v. Atlantic Refining Co.
92 Pa. Super. 590, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 80
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ensell v. Atlantic Refining Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 Pa. Super. 586 →
Opinion
Opinion by
In an opinion this day filed at No. 312, October T., 1927, we have stated our reasons for affirming the judgment entered upon the verdict in favor of Rebecca Ensell, the wife of the appellee in this appeal. There *591 is no complaint about the amount of the verdict in favor of Albert Ensell as it was for the exact amount of the cost of repairing his automobile. With this exception the cases are identical.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ensell v. Atlantic Refining Co., 92 Pa. Super. 590, 1928 Pa. Super. LEXIS 80 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).
92 Pa. Super. 590 (Ensell v. Atlantic Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.