Enriquez v. State
193 So. 3d 48, 2016 WL 1696693, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6384
Opinion
We affirm the order denying the defendant’s motion for re-sentencing following Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). But see Howard v. State, 180 So.3d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (Altenbemd, J., concurring); Atwell v. State, 128 So.3d 167 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013), review granted 160 So.3d 892 (Fla.2014).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Enriquez v. State, 193 So. 3d 48, 2016 WL 1696693, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 6384 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
193 So. 3d 48 (Enriquez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Howard v. State
180 So. 3d 1135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Atwell v. State
128 So. 3d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)