Enriquez v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Enriquez v. Selsky

296 A.D.2d 751, 744 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7444

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 18, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 296 A.D.2d 751 (Enriquez v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Enriquez v. Selsky, 296 A.D.2d 751, 744 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services [752]*752which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting participation in unauthorized organizational activities. The determination has now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services [752]*752which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting participation in unauthorized organizational activities. The determination has now been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional records. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see, Matter of Curtis v Goord, 274 AD2d 808; Matter of Maldonado v Miller, 259 AD2d 912).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

296 A.D.2d 751, 744 N.Y.S.2d 910, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enriquez-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack