Enriquez Transportation, Inc. Jed Transporation, Inc., Sergio Enriquez, Julianna Rico and Daisy Sanchez v. Erazmo Morales Salazar

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 24, 2013
Docket08-13-00090-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Enriquez Transportation, Inc. Jed Transporation, Inc., Sergio Enriquez, Julianna Rico and Daisy Sanchez v. Erazmo Morales Salazar (Enriquez Transportation, Inc. Jed Transporation, Inc., Sergio Enriquez, Julianna Rico and Daisy Sanchez v. Erazmo Morales Salazar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Enriquez Transportation, Inc. Jed Transporation, Inc., Sergio Enriquez, Julianna Rico and Daisy Sanchez v. Erazmo Morales Salazar, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

ENRIQUEZ TRANSPORTATION, INC., § JED TRANSPORATION, INC., SERGIO No. 08-13-00090-CV ENRIQUEZ, JULIANNA RICO, AND § DAISY SANCHEZ, Appeal from the § Appellants, 120th District Court § v. of El Paso County, Texas § ERAZMO MORALES SALAZAR, (TC# 2009-1679) § Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should

be dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellants have not filed a brief or a motion

for extension of time to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal.

This Court possesses the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the

Appellant has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for

such failure. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 975 S.W.2d 61, 63

(Tex.App. -- San Antonio 1998, no writ).

On June 20, 2013, the Clerk of the Court notified Appellants that their brief was past due

and no motion for extension of time to file a brief had been received. The Clerk also informed the parties of the Court’s intent to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days of

the notice, a party responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been

received as of this date. We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice July 24, 2013

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elizondo v. City of San Antonio
975 S.W.2d 61 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Enriquez Transportation, Inc. Jed Transporation, Inc., Sergio Enriquez, Julianna Rico and Daisy Sanchez v. Erazmo Morales Salazar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enriquez-transportation-inc-jed-transporation-inc--texapp-2013.